Click here to return to IRED.com
Navigation Tabs


Mortgage Lenders Tools for Agents Consumer Services Ratings and Icons Descriptions USA Realty Directory International Realty Directory Add or Enhance a Link in the IRED Directories Advertising on IRED Information about IRED Site Map








Archived Articles

Simeon Mitropolitski

Simeon Mitropolitski is a Canadian analyst, of Bulgarian descent, and former syndicated columnist with the Bulgarian News Agency (BTA). He is the author of several hundred articles dealing with the hot political and economic topics, both Bulgarian and international. ("A Royal Solution." World Press Review. June 1997, provides English versions).

He was part of the first group of Bulgarian intellectuals that began the opposition movement that finally put an end to the communist regime in the country, and in 1996-1997 participated in the international monitors' teams during the elections in several Balkan countries - Romania, Albania and Bulgaria. In 1999 he was among the few Bulgarian journalists that supported NATO military operation against Yugoslavia. In 2002 Simeon and his family emigrated from Bulgaria to Canada where they now live in Montreal, Quebec.

Global Real Estate Project
News Index

Directories
  Int'l Realty
  US Realty


3 March 2007

New states in Europe? Western direction

© 2007, IRED.Com, Inc., Simeon Mitropolitski

Push for political independence in some ex-communist countries may create false impression that only in this part of Europe people strive for statehood. In West, after decades of terrorist violence, e.g. Britain, Spain, situation is much more under control now. Yet desire for breaking political 'chains' is still present in some regions. European Union by eroding multiethnic nation-states unwillingly contributes to this murky prediction.

Political map of Europe looks not quite the same as it was just 20 years ago. Gone are Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia. Approximately 20 new states were created, some recreated, on the territories of these former federations. There are still some very small regions, e.g. Kosovo, Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, that are expected to break away thus creating new states. A first look at European map would suggest that these are things that can only happen in East. With EU enlargement the scope of process is limited to areas located outside its large area. Western Europe presents picture of peace and harmony, but this impression is false to a degree.

Few West European countries may break up shortly, e.g. Britain and Spain. Some other may see their regionalism significantly growing thus turning states into loose confederations, e.g. Belgium and Italy. Countries that seem more or less immune to this process are too small and highly homogenous like Denmark or Sweden or Portugal, or underwent process of homogenization more than a century ago like France or Germany. Recent waves of external immigration may have significant social and economic consequences, but they will hardly affect political status quo in any European country within next generation.

Britain and Spain stand apart from most West European nations. These are states built upon dynastic ties with no ethnic homogeneity. Furthermore, ethnic differences are accentuated with regionalization of political power. This regionalization initially was done in the name of appeasing ethnic separatism; nowadays it seems that general assessment of this process is rather the opposite, regionalization along ethnic lines exacerbates ethnic divisions. Both Britain and Spain lost their battle of cultural homogenization before turning to more regional autonomy. This means devolution of more power to ethnically defined regions is one-way road. It may be stopped or slowed down, but not reversed.

European Union plays the role of a 'villain' in this process. Brussels constantly takes new powers from national states. Furthermore, it provides some financial assistance directly to regions bypassing central state authority. In this way Brussels builds strong constituency among ethnic communities and makes them stronger vis-à-vis London and Madrid. Last but not least, European Union lowers cost of eventual secession, because any breaking away new state may remain within the Union. In the case of Spain, if a region breaks away, it will also remain within Euro and Schengen areas, defined by common currency and common external borders. To put it in comparative perspective, EU makes separation easier.

In a similar vein, EU will lead to more regionalization in countries like Italy and Belgium. These two countries also lost the battle against cultural regionalization so the process of turning into loose confederations is almost irreversible. Southern Italy unlike Basque country or Catalonia in Spain is much poorer compared to Italian average income, thus initial push for greater autonomy will hardly come from there. Belgium's two main regions are roughly equal in size and economic power, thus making any of them potential candidate for initiating peaceful devolution.

The only West European countries more or less immune to such trends are small and ethnically homogenous like Denmark, Sweden, and Finland. Exceptions are two big countries France and Germany where ethnic and civic homogenization occurred and basically ended during the period of European national romanticism by mid-19th c. Considering that EU is mainly German and French project it's hardly surprising that they have made it in such a way that it doesn't endanger their proper existence as nation-states. Other EU members however must adapt to new realities or reform profoundly or perish.

--------------------

See also the directory of companies providing real estate services in, and general real estate information of United Kingdom, Spain and Belgium.

Was this article helpful?    


See also:


| IRED Home | Search IRED |


© 1995-2008 IRED.Com, Inc
All Rights Reserved