Click here to return to IRED.com
Navigation Tabs


Mortgage Lenders Tools for Agents Consumer Services Ratings and Icons Descriptions USA Realty Directory International Realty Directory Add or Enhance a Link in the IRED Directories Advertising on IRED Information about IRED Site Map








Archived Articles

Simeon Mitropolitski

Simeon Mitropolitski is a Canadian analyst, of Bulgarian descent, and former syndicated columnist with the Bulgarian News Agency (BTA). He is the author of several hundred articles dealing with the hot political and economic topics, both Bulgarian and international. ("A Royal Solution." World Press Review. June 1997, provides English versions).

He was part of the first group of Bulgarian intellectuals that began the opposition movement that finally put an end to the communist regime in the country, and in 1996-1997 participated in the international monitors' teams during the elections in several Balkan countries - Romania, Albania and Bulgaria. In 1999 he was among the few Bulgarian journalists that supported NATO military operation against Yugoslavia. In 2002 Simeon and his family emigrated from Bulgaria to Canada where they now live in Montreal, Quebec.

Global Real Estate Project
News Index

Directories
  Int'l Realty
  US Realty


30 December 2006

More free movement within EU and beyond

© 2006, IRED.Com, Inc., Simeon Mitropolitski

European countries members of Schengen agreement on free movement of people may become many more a year from now. Most new EU members may qualify for membership thus making Europe the largest international free movement area. This decision has historic significance, eliminating one additional barrier before united Europe, with substantial economic and even more symbolic consequences.

Schengen agreement since mid-1980s requires member countries to abolish internal borders and to allow citizens of other member countries to freely enter and exit without showing passports or other identification documents. In fact Schengen eliminates internal borders as filters for free movement. This 'freedom' is in no way automatic after decades of more or less free movement of goods and capitals between EU members. Similar economic trans-border freedoms exist between other countries without necessitating elimination of border control and of internal borders in general, e.g. US-Canada frontier. Schengen is not synonymous to EU. Some 'old' EU countries are not part of Schengen agreement and still apply strict border control, e.g. Britain and Ireland. On the other hand, some non-EU countries are part of this agreement, such as Norway and Iceland.

Most new EU members that entered the union in 2004 may qualify for Schengen membership as early as January 2008 for air travels, and as early as March 2008 for land crossings. Only exception among new EU members so far remains Cyprus. To qualify for Schengen, European country needs proving that it can provide enough security for common external borders. Otherwise breach in borders in one place only may lead to elimination of any security protection for all Schengen countries. Particularly sensitive areas are located around southern and eastern Schengen borders due to waves of economic migrants 'storming the fortress' from Africa, Asia, and former USSR. Schengen agreement isn't irreversible. Any country member can impose temporarily or permanently border controls if she sees unprotected by other members. Such temporary reversals of course happen very rarely, for example during G-8 summits or big sportive and other events.

Significance of this move for new Schengen members cannot be overestimated. Economically this means elimination of another layer of bureaucracy making more difficult free movement of people. This bureaucracy makes nations pay not only because it employs expensive tools and staff. Even if border procedures are straightforward and client-friendly, time spent on borders cost billions. This calculation isn't overestimation. Hundreds of millions cross in both directions European borders each year, not including non-Europeans entering or exiting the continent. Spending only one hour waiting for usual border checking multiplied even by minimal hour wage produces 10-digit sums. In fact poorer EU members from east, located outside Schengen, still pay for high paychecks of western border officers. Spending only an hour on any land border is in fact not something people should even complain about, e.g. waiting one hour on well-organized US-Canadian border outside public holidays is something most people consider as a big luck.

Even more important however is symbolic side of Schengen enlargement to east. Many new EU members fear they are unfairly considered to be second category of members, being for now excluded from certain common European policies like Schengen or common currency Euro. There is no other way of showing these countries that they are wrong but by inviting them to join these remaining areas of common interest where the west still continues expressing unabated sensitivity and precaution. There is no certainty that all EU post-communist countries will join Schengen as early as 2008; even if some of them are invited however this will be a strong message to the others that this discrimination is only temporary and that fixing the problem depends mainly on most interested countries.

--------------------

See also the directory of companies providing real estate services in, and general real estate information of Europe.

Was this article helpful?    


See also:


| IRED Home | Search IRED |


© 1995-2008 IRED.Com, Inc
All Rights Reserved