|
Archived Articles ![]() Simeon Mitropolitski is a Canadian analyst, of Bulgarian descent, and former syndicated columnist with the Bulgarian News Agency (BTA). He is the author of several hundred articles dealing with the hot political and economic topics, both Bulgarian and international. ("A Royal Solution." World Press Review. June 1997, provides English versions). He was part of the first group of Bulgarian intellectuals that began the opposition movement that finally put an end to the communist regime in the country, and in 1996-1997 participated in the international monitors' teams during the elections in several Balkan countries - Romania, Albania and Bulgaria. In 1999 he was among the few Bulgarian journalists that supported NATO military operation against Yugoslavia. In 2002 Simeon and his family emigrated from Bulgaria to Canada where they now live in Montreal, Quebec.
Global Real Estate Project
|
India: Money, democracy, and modernizationIndia continues its fast economic progress. Still far behind its major Asian competitor, China, in terms of GDP per capita, India shows potential of taking off the ranks of poor countries in not so distant future. Parallel modernization processes occur in almost all areas of social life. Fertility rates for example are falling down, in some states they are already near the simple replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman. Peasant population is moving to the cities in large numbers, even if the majority still lives out of subsistence agriculture. General modernization affects society in different ways. It creates new opportunities, but also puts the country before major risks. Two of them come from unexpected directions, political freedoms and more disposable money. India must tame these risks without putting in danger its political freedoms. The example of China, where modernization produces tens of thousands small riots each year, is very instructive in that sense. Modernization means more money, and rising economic disparities, at least temporarily. India is a country with overcrowded cities, tens of thousand people living per sq. mile. The demographic pressure will only get stronger in the years to come with large number of peasants moving from their subsistence agriculture to better jobs and more economic options. On the other hand, the new wealth will inevitable, we hope only temporarily, be concentrated in the hands of few. More disposable incomes of few are already making real estate off reach for the vast majority. This leaves millions with no good prospects. For them national wealth will mean first and foremost personal misery. Ironically the next years, perhaps a full decade will be the most difficult for India in terms of modernization. It will have to pay the high social cost of it far before being able to reap the first national-wide harvest of prosperity. The situation for those who by tradition occupy the bottom of the social pyramid will get even worse. Their chances to get off the social trap will be minimal. Every new investment, especially in real estate, will only aggravate the situation. The irony is that these investments, in industrial, commercial, and residential properties, in long term are the only real opportunity for India to overcome its perennial economic backwardness. Another very risky area is the fact that India is perhaps the only big Third World country experiencing long history of liberal democratic political institutions. Fast economic modernization in some way shrinks the popular support for democratic institutions. This was one of the reasons why Indian leadership after the independence didn't opt for fast economic progress, opting instead to provide measures appeasing the huge majority of population, the peasants. At no time so far India has taken forcefully the money it needs for modernization out of the peasants, the usual way of doing this in traditional but non-democratic societies. Introducing VAT tax is the first major step in this direction and mass protests in both cities and villages show the limits of this unprecedented state intervention into the ordinary people's pockets. Every country allows economic progress to a certain point without major social backlash. Unlike many sugar-sweat predictions pouring about Indian economy and making big headlines in Western newspapers, our forecasts are much more cautious. India has a strong weapon in making its modernization more peaceful and predictable, and this is the established system of publicly supported institutions. These institutions however, by giving power to the mass of poor people, can produce backlash against modernization and against wave of new investments. The worst scenario will be to sacrifice these institutions in order to make the transition faster. In a large and poor country such as India such transition will take many decades. India should find its own magic formula how to do this without sacrificing its democratic political institutions. The example of China where uncertainty about democratization is the single most important danger ahead should not be repeated in India.
India country profile: --------------------
See also the directory of companies providing real estate services in, and general real estate information of India.
|
See also:
![]()